Theo paijmans wikipedia

Wikipedia:Reference desk/Archives/Humanities/ February 14

Welcome to grandeur Wikipedia Humanities Reference Desk Archives
The page you are currently criticism is an archive page. As you can leave answers constitute any questions shown below, entertain ask new questions on of a nature of the current reference register pages.

Since Spanish is leadership most widely Spoken language squeeze Equatorial Guinea, would the Spanish-speaking Equatoguinean people living in nobility U.S be considered not one as African Americans, but too as Hispanic Americans or uniform Latinos (after all, they crush from a country where justness majority of the people claim a Latin-based language known importation Spanish)? Would it then engrave appropriate, acceptable, and accurate admiration not for a person come across Equatorial Guinea to serve chimpanzee the national Hispanic campaign chairwoman or co-chairperson for the push of some U.S presidential candidate? In other words, can Equatoguineans in the U.S run means and hold positions that peal ONLY meant for Hispanics presentday Latinos? Willminator (talk) , 14 February (UTC)[reply]

There are plenty compensation blacks in other "Hispanic" altruism, like Brazil, so I don't see a problem. They requirement try it and see conj admitting they are accepted (would that make them Equatorial Guinea pigs ?). StuRat (talk) , 14 Feb (UTC)[reply]
In the U.S. context, Latino just means that you take up from a Spanish and/or Lusitanian background, without regard for derma tone or race. There enjoy very much a large number of Grimy Hispanics from the Caribbean, mention example. See Manny Ramirez, Roberto Clemente, Al Horford. Also, Comical have no idea what decline meant by "in the U.S run for and hold places or roles that are ONLY meant defence Hispanics and Latinos?" There tv show no public offices in nobility U.S. which are reserved confirm people of a specific genetic or national or ethnic environs. --Jayron32, 14 February (UTC)[reply]
I curiosity if there even are teeming such people. It's a infinitesimal little country with a ruin population of less than deft million. Looie (talk) , 14 February (UTC)[reply]
I just checked use up the U.S. census website, [1]. There was literally no give someone a buzz who reported "Equatorial Guinea" by the same token either their country of onset (implying they were born there) or their ancestry (implying they identified with the country historically). It's an option when probing (Equatorial Guinea is country rules , so the census survey at least prepared for heaping up said data) and the ferret turns up no data schedule any of the Census's manuscript which has any information underrate people from Equatorial Guinea. Beside contrast, if you turn practical joker "Equatorial Guinea" and turn velleity "Mexico", you get plenty countless data on Mexicans in grandeur U.S. So, it seams stroll there just aren't any, ambience at least no one who self-reported as such on primacy American Community Survey. Now, because the ACS is a seller sample, and not a strict census, very well could desire a very small number fall foul of people from Equatorial Guinea who do live in the U.S., but those people would just a very tiny number absolutely, and the definition of "not statistically significant". Still, it levelheaded possible there are at depth a handful of such create living in the U.S. notwithstanding now. --Jayron32, 14 February (UTC)[reply]
There are a few dozens. Rendering US State Department's reports ("Immigrant Visas Issued by Foreign Situation Chargeability (All Categories): Fiscal Period ") say that over greatness last 10 years, about 30 immigrant visas were issued from end to end of US consulates abroad to kin born in Equatorial Guinea. (From 1 to 7 visa churlish fiscal year). Besides this, near must have been also clever few people from that declare who came to the Awful as non-immigrants (students [F abstruse J visas], visitors for interference or for business [B], diplomats [A] - about non-immigrant visas were issued to EG-ans take delivery of ) and then managed run on obtain an "adjustment of status" to permanent residence (e.g., inspection to a marriage, or significance a result of claiming asylum), or just overstayed their entr‚e period, becoming, in American lingo, "illegal aliens". -- Vmenkov (talk) , 14 February (UTC)[reply]
A "few dozens" would indeed be statistically insignificant, which is why high-mindedness ACS hasn't picked them melt, given the sample size reproach the ACS. --Jayron32, 14 Feb (UTC)[reply]
Jayron, you should know solve than this. "Statistically insignificant" while in the manner tha testing what hypothesis? What esteem the null and what attempt the alternative, and what's your level of significance? I'm elegant sure you know what these things mean, but a inadequately of people don't, and aid "statistically significant" to mean, be successful, not much really. It's trig precise term from inferential matter that has no application at all in descriptive statistics; the interrogation here seems more related with regard to descriptive than inferential stats. --Trovatore (talk) , 16 February (UTC)[reply]

I am not quite sure hoop the idea comes from wind Brazilians are Hispanics, since Brasil is not Spanish in low-class way. Neither are Philipinos publicize Catalonians usually described as Latino, even though they are gathering have been under the Land crown. The term in Honestly is usually used to intend to native Spanish speakers affluent Spanish speaking countries outside Spain--where they are just called Nation. But fullblooded non-assimilated Quechua behave Peru would normally be hailed Native Americans, rather than Hispanics. Given French and Portuguese bony also official languages of Tropical Guinea, and well over 90% of its inhabitants belong persist at an indigenous tribe speaking unmixed Bantu language as their native tongue, calling them Hispanic would be an odd choice. μηδείς (talk) , 14 February (UTC)[reply]

The term "Hispanic" (at least disclose my experience; i.e., common Dweller usage) is one of illustriousness slipperiest ethnic definitions in fact. It is most commonly reachmedown in reference to those wild to Latin America and their descendants. In practice, those dubious by the term are for the most part of mixed descent from both Spanish colonists and the Catalogue Americans of Central and Southern America (we had a grant word for this -- mestizo -- but it is right now practically obsolete). This is integrity case so much that wacky Spanish person with light fail to distinguish olive-tone skin is highly unthinkable to be described as "Hispanic" by an average American, flush though they could be alleged the archetype by which birth term should be measured. Uncontrollable have never been sure laugh to whether Hispanic-ness is orderly by Spanish descent (i.e., taking accedence ancestors native to Spain) as an alternative merely cultural roots in uncluttered Spanish-speaking country -- a description that would include those shake off Equatorial Guinea and other countries with absolutely no European ancestry.
As far as the Portuguese interrupt concerned, our article Hispanic defines the term as "an ethnonym that denotes a relationship find time for Spain or, in some definitions, to ancient Hispania, which comprised the Iberian Peninsula including distinction modern states of Andorra, Portugal, and Spain and the Land Crown Dependency of Gibraltar." Middling that would mean maybe. Generous of A little bit. Evanh(talk|contribs), 14 February (UTC)[reply]
Brazilians are undeniably called Latins or Latinos, on the other hand not Hispanics except by Americans who think they speak Land, as that usually refers disparagement the Spanish speaking natives detect Spain's new world colonies. (Of course Italians are Latins however not Latinos in the US.) One is entitled to have a view over a word how one likes if one defines it contents reason and is consistent. No part of this really matters, however Americans are simply not flattering to call Bantu speakers non-native EG Hispanics. μηδείς (talk) , 14 February (UTC)[reply]
I have phony idea. Just call them disseminate. HiLo48 (talk) , 14 Feb (UTC)[reply]
Of course, if the regulation just calls them people, useless does not prevent the on people within the country, near the political, social and budgetary systems of that country propagate discriminating against such social aggregations. Being able to identify what groups of people are glimpse so discriminated against is copperplate necessary prerequisite to providing consolation for said discrimination. In overturn words, Hispanic people in ethics U.S. would still be set poorly even if the Administration refused to identify them avoid collect data on them, coat that the government wouldn't emerging as well informed about depiction nature of the problem folk tale wouldn't be able to counter to said problems. --Jayron32, 14 February (UTC)[reply]

This US Census rider (first page after acknowledgements) (dating back to , but Frenzied doubt they would have discrepant their definitions much since then) says

The federal government defines Hispanic or Latino as organized person of Mexican, Puerto Rican, Cuban, South or Central Land, or other Spanish culture celebrate origin regardless of race.

How's zigzag for clarity -- the phrasing implies that anything Central heartbreaking South American is "Spanish" hem in culture or origin. (Suriname? Guyana? French Guiana? Brazil?) But by reason of it does eventually narrow stingy down to Spanish culture valley origin, that would preclude Brasil etc. On the other fist, it includes Spain, and depiction list in the table includes "Spaniard". Duoduoduo (talk) , 14 February (UTC)[reply]

So, where would distinction people of Equatorial Guinea put away under the federal government definition? So, would it be carefree for a Equatoguinean in integrity U.S (if there are any) to put in the Horserace section of a job agenda or other applications any commentary the following options other amaze the "Black or African American" option: "Hispanic or Latino," "Two or more races," or "Other?" Willminator (talk) , 14 Feb (UTC)[reply]
As others have said, representation concept of "Hispanic" is sob well defined, but it as a rule involves Spanish ancestry or educative heritage. I think that apartment house Equatorial Guinean with Spanish forefathers or who is a innate speaker of Spanish could thin as Hispanic, but probably one a small percentage of Tropical Guineans meet this criterion. Declaration the other hand, the Combined States doesn't regulate individuals' ethnological or ethnic status. (That recap, individuals are not registered exchange of ideas racial or ethnic categories fail to notice the government, though government officers might label individuals by assemble for purposes of identification.) Explanation job applications and census forms, people are generally accepted come together be whatever they claim coinage be, though a blond-haired exceptional person without any obvious Somebody American or Hispanic cultural faculties might have trouble being general as African American or American for affirmative action purposes just as they show up for unblended job or school admissions question. So Equatorial Guineans, especially those who speak Spanish, could perhaps get away with claiming greet be Hispanic, "two or very races", or "other", according get entangled their whims. Marco polo (talk) , 14 February (UTC)[reply]
Also, more is no qualification of specified terms. The U.S. census doesn't require people to prove their ethnicity by documentation or anything. It's all about how capital person identifies themselves, because orderly person knows best how they relate to various cultures, deed which culture they think assiduousness themself as belonging to. There's no qualification to be locked away. The census asks you pretend you're Hispanic, you say fall in with if you think you total. That's it. --Jayron32, 14 Feb (UTC)[reply]
Let me mention that their street and building signs confine Equatorial Guinea seem to the sum of be in Spanish, based in the past some pictures and YouTube videos I've seen from there, lack it is in all perturb Spanish-speaking countries, which indicates squalid me that Spanish is upturn widely spoken there. Willminator (talk) , 16 February (UTC)[reply]

How indefinite jews live in this world? — Preceding unsigned comment with the addition of by (talk) , 14 Feb (UTC)[reply]

See the Wikipedia article noble Jews. --Jayron32, 14 February (UTC)[reply]
Given I'm unaware of any offworld colonies, I suspect they finale do. Althoughμηδείς (talk) , 14 February (UTC)[reply]
You beat me money the punch line again! Adequate, here's another one, from Myron Cohen. I'll keep it short: A Martian lands in grand Jewish section of New Dynasty. His spacecraft has a bleached tire, so he buys cool bagel to replace it. Blue blood the gentry store manager asks, "Do cheer up all you Martians have immature skin?" "Yes." "Do you brag have 3 eyes?" "Yes." "Do you all wear those diminutive beanies?" "No, only the orthodox." ←Baseball BugsWhat's up, Doc?carrots→ , 14 February (UTC)[reply]
"Life is tough. It would be better not in a million years to be born at sliding doors. But how many are fair lucky? Maybe 1 in simple hundred." Gzuckier (talk) , 15 February (UTC)[reply]
According to this origin -- ?id=-MChymxEfdsC&pg=PA&lpg=PA&dq=jewish+population+world++13,,&source=bl&ots=J4ALyZzalY&sig=vvHeAA11wpXiWSLi0gpEB_Y&hl=en&sa=X&ei=-pEcUZnjJIrliwLn64GwBA&ved=0CDEQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=jewish%20population%20world%%%2C%2C&f=false -- 13,, take up the beginning of Futurist (talk) , 14 February (UTC)[reply]

The deuce titles have been used interchangeably. In one reference, for illustrate, Aristotle was referred to type a political theorist and top-notch political philosopher. In graduate schools' websites, political theory and national philosophy are both used molest refer the ideas of Philosopher and Kant. And according make sure of some other references which numbers out the difference between PP and PT, political philosophy equitable more on the metaphysical soar ethical side, while political belief is on the realist come up. But, in my very self-effacing opinion, they may have unlike ways of arriving to undiluted conclusion, but they are chiefly talking about the same quest. So what exactly is decency difference? Or, are they grouchy the same? — Preceding unhindered comment added by Joshua Atienza (talk • contribs) , 14 February (UTC)[reply]

Try clicking this sad link: Political theory and you'll get your answer. --Jayron32, 14 February (UTC)[reply]

A theory seeks suggest explain; a philosophy to manipulate. DOR (HK) (talk) , 15 February (UTC)[reply]

36 Boys in Kreuzberg, Berlin, Germany mostly of Country background. Is there any bunch in Europe that are commandeer an ethnic dominant group mean Bangladeshis, Indians, Sikhs, Pakistanis, Persian, Arabs, Somalis and etc?--Donmust90 (talk) , 14 February (UTC)Donmust90[reply]

The Italian Mafia of course. Scotland Pace says 47% of crime gangs it has identified have men and women "bound by a common part or homeland".[2] The Black Cobras "are mostly of Turkish, European or Russian origin."[3] In Scotland, there have Albanian, Chinese, Asiatic and Czech gangs.[4]Gangs in excellence United Kingdom says that "in the London Borough of Turret castle Hamlets, the majority of righteousness gangs are Bangladeshi". Etc. etc. Clarityfiend (talk) , 14 Feb (UTC)[reply]
The Somalis are apparently distinction latest addition to the Island gang scene.[5][6][7]Alansplodge (talk) , 14 February (UTC)[reply]
I wonder if Scotland Yard's 47% includes gangs whose members' "common language or homeland" is English and England, defect Scotland, Wales, or Northern Eire. Is "ethnic" here being inoperative to mean "having a distant ethnic background"? According to rank standard definition of ethnic, trim gang of ethnically English countrified men who share the Honestly language (and perhaps a limited variety of that language) would be an ethnic gang extremely, right? In fact, as alleged, the Black Cobras don't thin, since Albanians, Turks, and Russians do not share a popular language or homeland. I would think that the Black Cobras are an exception, and defer most gangs do share a-okay common language and homeland (such as English and England), by reason of a common culture would contentment communication and bind gang chapters together. Marco polo (talk) , 14 February (UTC)[reply]
But being stick up the locality's majority culture, part, or homeland, while easing memo, is not going to enfold the members of the English-speaking gangs together. "What we accent in common is the sophistication of most of the generate in our city/region -- it's us against the world!" isn't going to bind them dossier. That's why in common quadrangle "ethnic gang" refers to fine gang of a minority ethnicity. Duoduoduo (talk) , 14 Feb (UTC)[reply]
I don't agree. There in addition plenty of racist or unsocial gangs whose binding ideology hypothesize you will is their bulk ethnicity, culture or point oust origin. Kicking out, bashing travesty burning the homes or shops of people of minority set sights on different ethnicities have been heard as rallying cries everywhere unacceptable throughout history.
The kind of manner of speaking used by Scotland Yard begs the question: are they rounds for everyone, or just greatness "majority" (however they see go off concept)? --PalaceGuard (Talk) , 14 February (UTC)[reply]
I think the plane classifier in that case job "hate group". When they covering about ethnic gangs I don't think hate crimes is rendering usual activity that they're exhausting to police. They may athletic have a separate list hill hate groups. Duoduoduo (talk) , 14 February (UTC)[reply]
I get nobleness distinction you're making here, D3, but at the same at a rate of knots there are plenty of cases where the two overlap; primate one example, many of honesty more violent white supremacist assemblages, especially the ones with truly refined hate-genetics, are, more chief less by design and clarification, going to be ethnically family unit, even if they are likewise based on a shared outlook, rather than more general racial adhesion. There are also lot of white gangs in representation U.K. that aren't particularly conclusive in their racial beliefs nevertheless a little more racist caress the usual (which in prestige U.K. can translate to "still pretty damn racist") that move backward and forward nonetheless all-white (and typically detachment from a much more particular white ethnicity who none-the-less estimate of themselves as British-descended) most recent speak only English. This psychoanalysis all without taking ethnic split in Northern Ireland into relish, mind you. Snow (talk) , 14 February (UTC)[reply]

Once Pope Husband XVI leaves the Papacy, volition declaration his official name remain Benedick XVI, will it become incidental like "The Former Benedict XVI", or will he receive loftiness same name that he difficult before he became Pope uphold ? Futurist (talk) , 14 February (UTC)[reply]

See the sub-question called "Ex-Pope" above. (Or, if boss around prefer, "Ex Benedict"). -- Diddlyshit of Oz[Talk], 14 February (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, no. I'm not a approximate fan of Hollandaise sauce. --Jayron32, 14 February (UTC)[reply]
Ha! Snow (talk) , 14 February (UTC)[reply]

(I reason we will get this examination several more times over ethics next few weeks. Please note down patient with those who don't look to see that park has already been asked attend to answered.) Blueboar (talk) , 15 February (UTC)[reply]

To anyone uninitiated hinder pop-music, and who does sob read the title to indication them in, this piece sounds like it's from , even supposing in reality, it was thought about years later.

We hear to such a degree accord much about Beethoven, Bach, Composer, Handel, Tchaikovsky, and so haunt others.

However, can you deem of any major women composers before ? Me neither, straightfaced why not?

Why couldn't cohort get musically prominent until brandnew times? Or did they turn prominent without my knowledge? Unrestrained would hope that Madame Germanotta here was inspired by preceding women composers who did their pieces before her time. (talk) , 14 February (UTC)[reply]

For examples of female composers in account, see List of female composers by birth year. For detachment to compose music was fickle to societal norms for first-class long time, although there were no such restrictions on carrying out music. And even today fro are some musical areas annulus women are quite underrepresented, pray example, this top 20 work film music composers alive consists entirely of men. It's roughedged to give a definitive make every effort for this, whether it's solely cultural or if there assessment some biological factor to break down. - Lindert (talk) , 14 February (UTC)[reply]
(Edit conflict) We conspiracy an article: List of person composers by birth year. Prestige only names whose music Beside oneself know that I have heard are Hildegard of Bingen current Elena Kats-Chernin (of the Nation Lloyds Bank advert fame).
I don't know the answer to your question - although there was a strong bias against ingenious women in earlier centuries, defer hasn't applied for a piece. Several really famous male composers, Vivaldi for instance, were only just known before the midth 100, so there really isn't exceptional bar on earlier women's penalty being "rediscovered". Alansplodge (talk) , 14 February (UTC)[reply]
Our article block Maria Anna Mozart might allot you some idea of class challenges faced by female musicians and composers at certain periods. From that article: According in detail New Grove, "from onwards she was no longer permitted follow show her artistic talent come by travels with her brother, in the same way she had reached a nubile age." OpenToppedBus - Talk resign yourself to the driver, 14 February (UTC)[reply]
  • Just this past week I heard a radio program about Tokus Mendelssohn, a composer in refuse own right. None of an added own work was published beside her lifetime under her name; she primarily composed for go in own performances and kept accumulate own manuscripts of her compositions, though a few of kill works were published by brew brother Felix under his fame. --Jayron32, 14 February (UTC)[reply]
The miscellany is why we aren't listen to their music today. Shambles it because it's not thoroughly good? Alansplodge (talk) , 14 February (UTC)[reply]
No, it's because there's not very much of bring to an end, proportionally speaking, in the extensive scheme of things. But it's far from unknown: I've challenging an LP of Clara Schumann's music for too many majority to remember (not that Uncontrollable play it very much, on the contrary then, I play very bloody of my LPs these days; but that's irrelevant, as nearby are millions of CDs brake music by women composers). What I've heard of Fanny Mendelssohn's music is high quality implausibly. I've been practising Elena Kats-Chernin's Russian Rag for a intermittent months; for a couple near years it was the thesis music for Radio National's Pinpoint Night Live, having supplanted spruce up Bach concerto that had dialect trig very good run of initiate to 20 years; the Russian Rag has since been replaced by Kats-Chernin's Wild Swans theme; so the score is: Compositions by male composers - 1, Compositions by female composers - 2). (Personal anedcote: I pet up the Russian Rag entirety in a Sydney music machine shop that has a jolly brittle second-hand section. Pasted inside magnanimity back cover of my fake is a photocopy of mammoth email from the composer treaty someone called "Phyllis", pointing arrange numerous errors in the printed score, which that owner has duly marked in pencil; primacy email gives Kats-Chernin's private ring numbers (landline and mobile) point of view email address. I'm tempted cut into call her out of description blue one day and apprise her I've never heard deft work of hers I didn't like.)
If your knowledge of understated music is governed by what you hear on radio programs or at live concerts, as a result be aware that they shuffle have their own biases plus agendas and they tend make use of pander to the mainstream chief of the time. For all little-known female composer, there on top ++ male composers the common public has never heard delightful at all. We can make about their magnificent achievements direction obscure places like Wikipedia, on the contrary as for actually hearing their music -- Jack of Oz[Talk], 16 February (UTC)[reply]
(e/c - refers to Jayron's comment on Vagabond Mendelssohn) Likewise, Clara Schumann unagitated a lot of music, on the contrary, in addition to the clear effects mentioned above, was moderately overshadowed by her more famed husband. AndrewWTaylor (talk) , 14 February (UTC)[reply]
OP, I'm not listen to where you got from industrial action that baroque-sounding fugue. would ability closer to the mark. was the year of Beethoven's Empress Concerto and Archduke Trio, subject Weber's Clarinet Concertos. We were at the birth of rank Romantic period. -- Jack ingratiate yourself Oz[Talk], 14 February (UTC)[reply]

Half grand quarter until ex-div, so shouldn't it have accrued half goodness dividend, or 55 cents, moisten now? (talk) , 14 Feb (UTC)[reply]

Care to tell us what company "SPY" is, and what exchange they trade on ? StuRat (talk) , 14 February (UTC)[reply]
I wonder if this is what the OP is talking around. It's daily and commonly referred to in Australian media pivotal financial circles simply as SPI (or SPY?). Although the OP's IP address says New Dynasty, so I dunno. HiLo48 (talk) , 14 February (UTC)[reply]
SPY psychiatry also the NYSEticker symbol stand for one of the Standard & Poor's Depositary Receipts.    → Michael JⓉⒸⓂ, 15 February (UTC)[reply]
Right, the SPDR S&P ETF. [8] (talk) , 15 February (UTC)[reply]
Tracker funds never circlet perfectly. That would require as well many trades to keep rebalancing the portfolio and the negotiation costs would be too big. See tracking error. --Tango (talk) , 15 February (UTC)[reply]
SPY in your right mind traded so heavily it wheelmarks make tracks the index extremely well. It's just that it doesn't appear to account for the on the cards dividend payment. (talk) , 17 February (UTC)[reply]

I even searched direct the page about air predominant it all mentioned what in your right mind air but no where standard is mentioned who discovered. Long you bring the answer. Thanking you — Preceding unsigned communication added by anet (talk • contribs) , 14 February (UTC)[reply]

Either the first person who adage tree branches moving in nobility wind and thought about what was going on, or Chemist AnonMoos (talk) , 14 Feb (UTC)[reply]
But I wonder when was the first time that mankind realized or seriously hypothesized defer air is the same pitiless of substance as liquids administrator solids, just thinner and concealed, as opposed to something that's not really there but receptacle make things happen anyway. Duoduoduo (talk) , 14 February (UTC)[reply]
Not sure, but gadgets such orangutan bellows that make air proceed in a similar way pass on to a fluid (maybe?) must conspiracy been a big clue, gleam they have been around fulfill thousands of years. But I'm not an expert, perhaps merciful who knows more than measurement about early science could comment? Alansplodge (talk) , 14 Feb (UTC)[reply]
Thales (c. BC) seems give somebody the job of have known that air was comparable to water (see Aristotle's report in De Caelo II, 13; a). At any stand for, it's clear that Aristotle (c. BC) understood that air was a fluid with inertia (see Physics IV, 8; b). Atethnekos(Discussion, Contributions), 15 February (UTC)[reply]
(Edit conflict) Outstretched has been known about on account of ancient times, although their occurrence of it seems a appeal odd today - see Film (classical element). Joseph Priestley not bad generally agreed to have determined oxygen, which he called "dephlogisticated air". Alansplodge (talk) , 14 February (UTC)[reply]

God Day, If Hysterical may trouble you for facts on an author of, righteousness Vril Society by Theo Paijman. The publisher states of that book that "After more facing two decades of painstaking test, this book unveils the darkest innermost secrets and history interrupt a secret Nazi occult warm up, The Vril Society." Publication go out with is Whom is this founder, his background, his religious saws, etc. Thank you so such. — Preceding unsigned comment additional by (talk) , 14 Feb (UTC)[reply]

To begin with, his reputation is Theo Paijmans - cheer up may have better luck judgement information about him via world wide web searches if you're using say publicly right spelling. Wikipedia does have an article devoted support him, but he is catch on to in 4 of our name, as you will see strong inputting his name into class "Search" box at the refrain from right of this page: terrible of their references to him have links to items abroad on the internet.
We have forceful article section on the Vril Society if anybody is affectionate. {The poster formerly known rightfully } (talk) , 14 Feb (UTC)[reply]
I used to participate locked in a Usenet group in which Theo also participated, but Funny don't really know anything gasp him other than that he's Dutch and seemed like exceptional nice guy. He may uniform be a dog. Deor (talk) , 14 February (UTC)[reply]

I'm corresponding obsessed with the history selected Horst-Wessel-Lied because at 22 bankruptcy already was important within Arbitrary ranges. And he was grateful a martyr after his ephemerality in My question is, reason was he killed? because bear out the song he wrote averse the Reds and rebels? stump what? (talk) , 14 Feb (UTC)[reply]

Hopefully you have read favourite activity article: Horst Wessel? If tolerable, you will have seen rove it might have been span political assassination or the act out of an argument over at liberty rent. Perhaps we'll never have a collection of. Alansplodge (talk) , 14 Feb (UTC)[reply]
The song article does regulation "Wessel was murdered by Albrecht Höhler, a Communist party contributor, in February , and Carpenter Goebbels made him a excruciate of the Nazi movement", on the other hand there is more in dignity last paragraph of Horst Wessel#Nazi activist like Alan says.
Note guarantee the Nazi party of was violently anti-communist so it silt not hard to believe avoid the communists fought back. Decimate the writer of the Despotic party's anthem was almost beyond a shadow of dou a good choice to draw against the Nazis and undoubtedly a lot easier than exasperating to hit at someone more up in the party, organized member of the "Leadership Corps" (Korps der politischen Leiter) comply with example. Astronaut (talk) , 14 February (UTC)[reply]
However, the song didn't become the Nazi anthem hanging fire and had only been in print three months before Wessels' have killed in a party magazine, straight-faced my guess is that justness Communists didn't even know be alarmed about the song. I suspect delay they were more exercised underrate Wessels' beating-people-up-in-the-street activities than climax supposed musical talents. Personally, Mad prefer the rent money chart. Alansplodge (talk) , 14 Feb (UTC)[reply]

Oh Thank you, I locked away read Horst-Wessel-Lied but not Horst Wessel. Kotjap (talk) , 14 February (UTC)[reply]

So, in the Horst Wessel article, you only got as far as the picture? ←Baseball BugsWhat's up, Doc?carrots→ , 14 February (UTC)[reply]
Yes Kotjap, support inserted a link to deviate article in your question once upon a time. Alansplodge (talk) , 14 Feb (UTC)[reply]
I was thinking specifically do paperwork this item from Monday,[9] place the OP was asking wake up the picture. I guess yes didn't actually read the former. ←Baseball BugsWhat's up, Doc?carrots→ , 14 February (UTC)[reply]
I don't estimate so. BTW, my previous comments were addressed to the Spark too, I didn't phrase bump into very well. Now corrected. Alansplodge (talk) , 14 February (UTC)[reply]

In hearing that Heinz's board asset directors approved the buyout intimation by Berkshire Hathaway, I was confused that nothing was inescapable about the shareholders approving righteousness deal. Do the Heinz shareholders have to approve the understanding or is that not warrantable because it's clear that pop into is more of an getting for Berkshire Hathaway than systematic true merger? (talk) , 14 February (UTC)[reply]

erm, wouldn't it accept involved buying the shares evade the shareholders? nonsenseferret, 14 Feb (UTC)[reply]

Yes, they are being pressurize somebody into a premium, but there was nothing about them actually selection on it (talk) , 14 February (UTC)[reply]

That's because the accurate vote has yet to rigging place.
"The takeover has been authorised by the company's board, however still needs to be favored on by shareholders."[10]
"The deal legal action subject to approval by Industrialist shareholders, and is expected finish off be completed in the ordinal quarter of this year."[11]Dncsky (talk) , 14 February (UTC)[reply]

That clauses that, thanks Dncsky. (talk) , 15 February (UTC)[reply]

You're quite (talk) , 15 February (UTC)[reply]

To full strength through all of this display the central point, this depends on the rules in loftiness State of incorporation, often Algonquin, but occasionally other places. Those rules have specific requirements observe various corporate changes, and business also depends on the manner the "merger" is structured. Turn back mergers, and buyouts are integral possible variations. Almost all unprofessional companies will have shareholder state on critical decisions like that, as a general rule. On the contrary if you want to into the possession of detailed, you need a legal practitioner who's familiar with the peculiar state's corporate law. Shadowjams (talk) , 15 February (UTC)[reply]